Draft Annual Governance Statement 2021/22
- Meeting of Audit and Governance Committee, Wednesday 12 October 2022 10.15 am (Item 31.)
- View the background to item 31.
To seek the view of the committee as to whether the draft Annual Governance Statement (AGS) for 2021/22 properly reflects the internal control environment the council is operating in and the appropriateness of actions identified to improve.
The Head of Strategic Finance presented the draft Annual Governance Statement (AGS) for 2021/22. It was reported that the AGS was primarily retrospective, it would be subject to audit by the External Auditor, and the final version would be published alongside the annual Statement of Accounts.
The committee discussed the draft AGS, the principal points included:
1. A committee member made a general comment that initiatives had been identified as controls within each principle but it was not stated whether these were effective or not.
2. With attention drawn to the sentence ‘Value for money continues to be a concern of the council in the guardianship of public funds, with a focus on the Balfour Beatty Living Places (BBLP) contract, but could equally apply to other long term contracts that were agreed’ (agenda page 30), a committee member questioned how assurance was gained that the services that Hoople Ltd was commissioned to provide represented value for money for the council.
In response, the Head of Strategic Finance explained that: value for money arrangements would be assessed separately by the External Auditors; the position and performance of Hoople Ltd was incorporated into the council’s financial statements through the group accounts; and the company was subject to its own statutory audit.
The Director of Resources and Assurance declared an Other Registrable Interest as a non-executive director of Hoople Ltd. The Director offered to provide a briefing for committee members on the requirements for companies operating under the ‘Teckal’ exemption from public procurement.
In response to a discussion about potential mechanisms to look at how Hoople Ltd was delivering services, the Director re-iterated that Grant Thornton would provide commentary on value for money arrangements and noted that the Scrutiny Management Board had identified an item within its work programme on Hoople Ltd; scheduled for 9 January 2023, link to the work programme.
The Senior Lawyer commented on: the origins of the company as a joint venture;
the Service Level Agreement decision that was published each year; and the work being undertaken on its management and shareholding arrangements, particularly in the context of new procurement regulations.
The Chairperson suggested an action to ensure that the new membership of the Audit and Governance Committee received a briefing on Teckal arrangements and Hoople Ltd in the municipal year 2023/24.
It was considered that reference to the work being undertaken in terms of Hoople Ltd should be included in the AGS.
3. With reference made to the activities within ‘Principle B: Ensuring openness and comprehensive stakeholder engagement’ (agenda page 34), such as the Citizens Climate Assembly, a committee member questioned whether engagement had been effective and whether action was being taken as a result of the feedback.
The Chairperson suggested that it would be useful if the external consultations that had taken place during the reporting year, and the responses as a datum, could be included in the AGS.
A committee member questioned the level of engagement with staff, including the interaction between the Programme Management Office and service areas in the development and delivery of projects.
The Chairperson noted that staff were a significant stakeholder and suggested that internal consultations should also be reflected in the document.
The Head of Strategic Finance said that a statement on the council’s assessment of effectiveness could be incorporated for each of the principles. It was commented that, with the AGS being subject to external audit, there was a balance in presenting the controls and the effectiveness of those controls from a governance perspective and documenting lots of detail on the nature of the activity.
4. The Vice-Chairperson commented that action b.1, ‘Produced an Engagement Plan based on a review of lessons learnt from the Citizens Climate Assembly and the effectiveness of the budget consultation’ (agenda page 25) was not presented as an action going forward, so could be referenced in the main text, with a link provided to the plan.
The Vice-Chairperson also commented that the development of the MyAccount feature, enabling residents to have their own digital account with a register to track correspondence, needed to be monitored and perhaps included as an action.
5. In relation to Principle D (agenda page 36), a committee member questioned whether the establishment of an Improvement Board, with an Improvement Plan, for children’s services was the right intervention given the change in Ofsted rating from ‘Requires improvement’ to ‘Inadequate’. It was also questioned how issues identified within that judgement which were endemic across organisation were being addressed.
6. With reference made to Principle C (agenda page 35), a committee member questioned how the council was tracking the Delivery Plan, particularly in light of comments made at a recent Scrutiny Management Board about the limited data that was available.
The Head of Strategic Finance commented that the document served to identify the areas where improvements to governance arrangements were needed.
The Director advised that Cabinet was tracking progress through quarterly reports.
A committee member questioned, if there were not sufficient resources to develop measures, whether this could be considered an effective control.
[Note: there was a short adjournment for ten minutes]
7. In relation to Principle E (agenda page 37), a committee member noted that all areas of the council had been impacted by staff vacancies and it was suggested that a further action may be needed in terms of organisational capacity.
In response to a question, the Director briefly commented on the positive impact of the Programme Management Office (PMO) in terms of capacity and said that this could be reflected in the next iteration of the AGS.
8. A committee member recommended that a further review of the document be undertaken in terms of explaining the reporting period, the use of Plain English, consistency in the treatment of numbers, checking references, and clarifying terminology. The Chairperson added that technical terms and phrases could include links to relevant explanations.
The Head of Strategic Finance outlined the quality control process prior to publication of the final version of the AGS.
9. In response to a further comment about the document needing to be clear about the reporting period given the intensity of work undertaken in terms of children’s services in recent months, the Head of Strategic Finance advised that the final version would reflect any governance arrangements that had occurred since April 2022, including an update on children’s services; this was being prepared with the input of the Commissioner for Children’s Services.
10. The Vice-Chairperson welcomed the actions to address compliance with mandatory training and to address gender pay gap and equality issues.
11. In response to a question from a committee member about the reference to ‘a service planning tool’ (agenda page 39), the Director recognised the need to review the wording of the paragraph. The Director commented on the challenges in terms of project management at that point in time and on the improvements made in relation to the use of the ‘Verto’ solution and the operation of the PMO; it was noted that the committee had requested further information on the Verto system (Action 160 refers) and a paper would be provided.
Another committee member commented that, where improvements had
been made, consideration should be given to the use of past tense,
such as ‘The council
does did not
operate an overarching system for tracking
12. In response to questions about action f.2, ‘Investigate purchase of software for recording and monitoring actions’, the Director advised that the council had introduced ‘PowerBI’ as a reporting tool which was able to interrogate other systems used within the council.
13. The Chairperson drew attention to the sentence ‘The governance for settlement agreements needs to be reviewed and confirmed in policy’ (agenda page 39) and suggested that clarification should be provided about the availability of this policy.
With reference made to the sentence ‘Cabinet in 29 July 2021 received a major contract performance update including summary of investigation into the Hereford City Centre Transport Package (HCCTP), and recommendations of establishing a Major Contract Improvement Board, with an Improvement Plan agreed on 1 March 2022.’ (agenda page 39), a committee member questioned whether the Improvement Plan was driving positive outcomes. The Chairperson added that responsibility for the Improvement Plan should also be made clear.
A committee member suggested that clarification was needed in relation to the sentence ‘Spend is at c86% of budget’.
The Director advised that the minutes of the Improvement Board were in the public domain. The Chairperson suggested that a link could be provided in the AGS.
14. At the end of the item, a committee member commented that the last set of published board meeting minutes for Hoople Ltd appeared to be 28 March 2022. The Director said that this would be queried at the next board meeting.
The committee considered and agreed the following resolution.
That the committee has determined that the draft Annual Governance Statement properly reflects the risk environment the council is operating in and that actions identified represent an appropriate response, subject to:
i. The inclusion of a commentary on effectiveness being included with each principle, with appropriate clarifications provided, including in relation to: Hoople Ltd; internal and external consultation; the availability of the Engagement Plan; the tracking of Delivery Plan actions; organisational capacity; the availability of the policy on settlement payments; the capital expenditure percentage in terms of HCCTP and responsibility for the delivery of the Improvement Plan.
ii. The document being reviewed in terms of the use of Plain English, including an explanatory paragraph on the reporting period, and with appropriate links to relevant glossaries.
177 The new membership of the Audit and Governance Committee receive a briefing on Teckal arrangements and Hoople Ltd in the municipal year 2023/24.
- Draft Annual Governance Statement 2021/22, item 31. PDF 216 KB
- Appendix 1 - Draft Annual Governance Statement 2021/22, item 31. PDF 996 KB