Items
| No. |
Item |
20. |
Apologies for absence
To receive apologies for absence.
Minutes:
Apologies had been
received from Councillor Frank Cornthwaite, Councillor Robert
Highfield and Councillor Ivan Powell (Cabinet Member Children and
Young People).
|
21. |
Named substitutes
To receive details of
members nominated to attend the meeting in place of a member of the
committee.
Minutes:
There had been no named substitutes.
|
22. |
Declarations of interest
To receive
declarations of interests from members of the committee in respect
of items on the agenda.
Minutes:
No declarations of interest were made.
|
23. |
Minutes PDF 156 KB
To receive the minutes of the meeting held on
12 May 2026.
Minutes:
The minutes of the previous meeting were
received.
Resolved: That the
minutes of the meeting held on 12 May 2026 be confirmed as a
correct record and be signed by the Chairperson.
|
24. |
Questions from members of the public
To
receive any written questions from members of the
public.
Minutes:
No questions had been
received from members of the public.
|
25. |
Questions from members of the council
To receive any written questions from members
of the council.
Minutes:
No questions had been received from members of
the council.
|
26. |
Families First Programme PDF 345 KB
To provides an overview of what has been
undertaken in Herefordshire to develop and implement the Families
First programme over the last 15 months.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
- Officers explained
that the Families First Programme forms part of national children's
social care reforms and the Children's Wellbeing and Schools
agenda. Herefordshire is in the first quarter of year two of a
three-year implementation programme. Progress has included
strengthened partnership working, development of a single Family
Help Assessment, practitioner training and establishment of new
Family Help Teams.
- Reflecting on year
one, officers reported that the focus had been on transformation
and co-production with partners, schools, health services and
families. A multi-agency steering group has been established and more than 170 practitioners have
completed Families First training. Feedback indicated increased
confidence in holding supportive conversations with families and
greater understanding of partner roles.
- Officers advised that
service redesign had created dedicated Families First Teams to
support partners undertaking Family Help work. These teams provide
training, consultation, meeting support and community development
expertise. Three locality-based Family Help Teams covering the
north, south and central areas of the county became operational on
1 July.
- Members welcomed
progress and asked how success would be measured. Officers
explained that a quality assurance framework combining performance
data, audits, practitioner feedback and family feedback had been
established. This would be benchmarked against existing measures,
with quarterly monitoring used to identify issues and assess
whether outcomes and experiences were improving.
- Concerns were raised
regarding long-term sustainability and funding. Officers advised
that the programme is currently supported by a three-year
government grant, but much of the approach has already been
embedded within core services. Evidence gathered through monitoring
could support future budget growth bids if required.
- Members asked how
value for money would be assessed. Officers explained that
indicators would include reductions in repeat referrals, repeat
assessments and repeat child protection plans, alongside evidence
that earlier intervention was reducing the need for statutory
involvement.
- One member questioned
whether nationally mandated reforms could disrupt arrangements that
were already working well locally. Officers stated that
Herefordshire had anticipated these changes and that the reforms
align closely with existing restorative and strengths-based
practice. Experience from national pathfinder authorities suggests
the approach strengthens early help and partnership working.
- Discussion turned to
the new digital self-assessment tool. Officers confirmed that
families would be able to seek advice, identify support services
and potentially begin a Family Help Assessment. However, no family
would be expected to complete this independently and practitioner
support would remain available.
- Members explored how
use of the digital platform would be monitored. Officers explained
that overall usage data, referral patterns and service demand
trends would be reviewed to determine whether families were
accessing support earlier and more effectively. Family feedback
would also inform future development.
- Questions were raised
about ongoing costs and development of the platform. Officers
advised that maintenance costs should be relatively low following
implementation. While uptake levels remain uncertain, testing and
evaluation form an important part of the wider reform programme.
Children and families have helped shape the content, language,
design and support links through co-production activity, with
further testing planned before launch.
- Officers confirmed
that the county's ...
view the full minutes text for item 26.
|
27. |
Early Help Task and Finish Group PDF 193 KB
To provide the committee with the draft final
report of its task and finish group looking at the provision of
early help.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
- The Chair introduced
the findings of the Early Help Task and Finish Group, noting that
the review had examined the Early Help landscape across
Herefordshire. The review identified a strong and developing system
supported by effective partnership working and a shared commitment
to improving outcomes for children, young people and families.
- Members highlighted
the importance of the Families First programme and Family Hubs in
strengthening preventative support and improving service
coordination.
- Officers provided an
update on the implementation of Families First. Members were
advised that Early Help teams had been integrated into locality
structures, with family help teams operating across all areas.
Training programmes were supporting implementation and a new Family
Help Assessment had been successfully piloted. Positive feedback
had been received from families, particularly regarding
opportunities for self-assessment and greater involvement in the
process. Full implementation was scheduled from 1 August.
- Members sought
clarification on whether the new arrangements would simplify access
to support. Officers confirmed that referrals would continue
through the Integrated Front Door but that processes would be
streamlined. Partner agencies would be able to submit Family Help
Assessments directly, reducing administrative barriers and
improving efficiency.
- The committee
discussed arrangements for identifying and supporting young carers.
Officers outlined plans for a "No Wrong Doors" approach, including
a screening tool within Family Help Assessments to support earlier
identification and access to appropriate services. Members also
discussed the national challenge of under-identification, noting
that training, awareness raising and new screening arrangements
were expected to improve identification rates.
- The committee
received an update on the Family Hub programme. Members were
advised that the initiative forms part of a national programme
bringing together a range of support services for families, with a
focus on younger children while maintaining an ambition to support
young people up to age 19, or 25 for those with SEND.
- Officers outlined
progress in establishing Family Hubs across the county through the
transformation of existing children's centres and the development
of additional sites. Provision would include parenting support,
speech and language services, infant feeding support, mental health
services, SEND support and activities to improve school readiness.
Members noted the importance of accessible, welcoming environments
where families could seek support at an early stage.
- Members raised
questions regarding long-term sustainability, including funding
arrangements and workforce capacity. Officers advised that
sustainability planning was underway and included embedding
successful initiatives within commissioned services, developing
workforce capacity, encouraging community ownership and building an
evidence base to support future investment opportunities. While
ongoing grant funding could not be guaranteed, the programme was
intended to demonstrate impact and strengthen future funding
bids.
- Members reflected on
challenges faced by partnership initiatives once time-limited
funding ended and noted the importance of using the Family Hub
programme to demonstrate the value of collaborative working.
Opportunities to explore alternative delivery models were also
highlighted.
- The committee sought
clarification on support for older children and young people.
Officers acknowledged that current funding was focused largely on
younger children but advised that planning for older age groups was
already ...
view the full minutes text for item 27.
|
28. |
Work programme PDF 211 KB
To consider the work programme for the
committee.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
- Members considered
the current work programme and received an update on the next steps
for its development. The Chair explained that further strategic
work was still required before the programme could be updated. To
facilitate this, a dedicated work programming meeting would be held
over the summer to review priorities and agree any necessary
changes.
- In response to
members' comments, officers confirmed that the work programme would
be revised and reissued before the October meeting. This assurance
was noted by the committee.
|
29. |
Date of the next meeting
Tuesday 6 October 2026, 2pm.
Minutes:
Tuesday 6 October 2026, 2pm.
|