Agenda and minutes

Venue: Committee Room 1, The Shire Hall, St. Peter's Square, Hereford, HR1 2HX

Contact: Ruth Goldwater, Governance Services 

Items
No. Item

102.

APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE

To receive apologies for absence.

Minutes:

Apologies were received from Cllr JG Lester, Diane Jones, Martin Samuels, Jo Melling and Jacqui Bremner.

 

103.

NAMED SUBSTITUTES (IF ANY)

To receive any details of members nominated to attend the meeting in place of a member of the committee.

Minutes:

Cllr JA Hyde substituted for Cllr JG Lester and Stephen Vickers substituted for Martin Samuels.

 

 

104.

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

To receive any declarations of interests of interest by members in respect of items on the agenda.

Minutes:

None.

105.

MINUTES pdf icon PDF 403 KB

To approve and sign the minutes of the meeting held on 7 February 2017.

Minutes:

It was confirmed that the action points identified at the meeting were with officers and updates were due to be reported to the meeting on 16 May 2017.

 

RESOLVED

That the minutes of the meeting held on 7 February 2017 be approved as a correct record and signed by the chairman.

106.

QUESTIONS FROM MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC

To receive questions from members of the public relating to matters within the board’s terms of reference.

 

(Questions must be submitted by midday 2 clear working days before the day of the meeting.)  

Minutes:

No questions were received.

107.

Better care fund 2016/17 quarter three performance report pdf icon PDF 435 KB

To note the better care fund 2016/17 quarter three national performance report as per the requirements of the programme.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The better care fund and integration manager presented the report. The following points were noted:

·         the quarter 3 return was submitted to NHS England on 3 March, having been signed off through delegated authority by the Clinical Commissioning Group accountable officer and the Council’s director for adults and wellbeing

·         For residential care, no improvement in performance was reported; admissions had increased and were at a higher level than a year ago; demand for nursing care appeared to have increased and placements were being evaluated individually

·         Non-elective admissions appeared to be meeting the target for reduction in admissions and this had been supported by the introduction of a number of initiatives including the “red bag” scheme which contained information about the individual when transferring between hospital and care home

·         community provision was being explored with the intention of freeing-up and understanding blockages in transfer of care

·         Healthwatch had developed a patient passport, which included medication and care information, which could be linked to the red bag scheme

·         In terms of risk sharing arrangements, there were some clients who were awaiting review, but it was planned for these to be completed by the end of March 2017.  It had taken time to carry out these reviews due to the various care pathways involved

·         There was a review of the intermediate rehabilitation pilot under rapid assessment and active therapeutic interventions in order to support people to regain independence. The pilot was to be extended to the end of June 2017

·         Further BCF policy and planning guidance was awaited and in the meantime, planning by partners continued. It was noted that the national conditions had been reduced from 8 to 4

·         With regard to financial implications there was pressure on the residential nursing element and funded nursing care

 

In answer to a question regarding an action plan to address bed blocking, it was explained that the better care fund was an enabler, bringing parts of the system together and drawing upon funding from commissioned services to drive changes.  There was quality assurance of every case funded by the local authority and there had been successes in supporting people to stay at home, which made it easier to predict changes in admissions, with the more complex cases staying longer or going into nursing care rather than residential care.  The pace of change was a challenge, but the focus was on promoting ongoing cultural change through strengths-based practice.

 

It was noted that there was a significant programme of work underpinning the sustainability and transformation plan and One Herefordshire to avoid admissions, and elements funded through the BCF needed to be considered as part of the overall system.  There was further work to be done to ensure the pace of change on reducing bed blocking was having an impact and continuing progress on redressing the trend in urgent care admissions. An additional factor was delayed transfer of care where patients from out of the county were unable to return home. 

 

It was confirmed that timeframes for transferring  ...  view the full minutes text for item 107.

108.

The Care Market pdf icon PDF 438 KB

To consider an account of the quality of the care market in Herefordshire for adults and children.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The assistant director operations and support introduced the adult care market element of the report, noting that the quality assurance framework offered some reassurance and there was good practice highlighted by the Local Government Association reflected in the Care Quality Commission’s report that the county had some of the best care homes in the country.

 

The senior commissioning officer highlighted that for the adult care market:

·         the report focused on the quality of the care market and domiciliary care market but that consideration was needed of other areas of contracting monitoring arrangements including the delivery of care by external providers as there was a significant self-funding market which created challenges.

·         There were just over 2000 beds in the care home sector and joint commissioning of around 500 of the bed capacity was an advantage.

·         Commissioners monitor planning applications in order to comment on the needs for nursing beds

·         With regard to the home care market, there are around 800 users and a significant number of small organisations as local

·         domiciliary care workers provided around 3000 hours per week of care

·         quality framework information gathered from service users and their families, and from providers, was used for reporting to the quality review panel. Ways of gathering more information from providers in care sector was being explored, to understand more about self-funding and to support providers to grow

·         Care Quality Commission ratings were good but there was work to be done around developing understanding of reablement and the home care market to encourage care homes to consider short-stays as a viable option. 

 

In answer to a question about delivering the reablement model in care homes, this was aspired to in the longer term and there was therapy in place at one home so there could be a step-up facility as well as a step-down facility, and more options could be considered to care for people at home. It was also noted that care homes were not carrying out assessments although this was a contractual requirement which needed following up.   Some of the homes were small with limited staffing resource to do this and to meet on-call and weekend cover requirements.

 

Responding to a question about encouraging collaboration between homes, the assistant director identified that was limited appetite for this despite the advantages and there was greater encouragement needed alongside greater focus on domiciliary care and help to live at home.  

There were also workforce planning implications and an observation was made regarding a poor perception of nursing home careers amongst the nursing profession despite competitive salaries, leading to recruitment difficulties.  This had led, in one case, to a provider withdrawing nursing care for challenging behaviour despite this being a growth area.

 

There were other factors affecting the overall condition of the nursing workforce, including vacancy levels, age profiles and salary levels falling in real terms. There could be a further impact from Brexit and potential loss of workforce from the EU.

 

The assistant director education and commissioning presented the children’s care market  ...  view the full minutes text for item 108.

109.

Health and wellbeing strategy update on priority two pdf icon PDF 310 KB

To review progress against delivering the children and young people’s plan and agree further actions to support its delivery

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The assistant director education and commissioning presented the report and the board considered the achievements and areas of focus as set out in the report.  The children and young peoples’ plan 2015-18 is the key deliverer of the health and wellbeing strategy, and focuses on 6 priorities:

 

1.                  Early help: It was noted that the strategy had been agreed and work was now taking place to develop the operational approach across Herefordshire.  Early help was taking place but could be more effective once greater clarity and enhanced systems are put in place, including the development of locally based family network meetings.  . Public health work included obesity, dental health and promotion of mental health particularly around reducing self-harm

2.                  0 – 5 early years: wider issues around outreach and access, particularly with regard to rural isolation was being considered in order to support families.  Health visiting and school nursing services were to be recommissioned later this year.

3.                  Mental health and emotional wellbeing: the Care Quality Commission had commented positively on the initial screening of cases by 2gether Mental Health CAMHS service as part of the local area SEND inspection. Schools were being supported with regard to resources for emotional wellbeing

4.                  Children and young people in need of safeguarding: focus on this continued and it was expected that there would be an Ofsted inspection next year. A peer review was planned to take place during June and September this year

5.                  Addressing challenges for teenagers: the number of young people not in employment education or training (NEET) was in line with regional trends but further work was required to understand the barriers in order to identify possible solutions. A factor to this was accessibility and discussion took place around transportation and what community resources existed to help overcome this

6.                  Children and young people with disabilities: there had been a positive inspection report and encouragement to share practice with other authorities. Workforce training was being developed around service reforms.

 

In response to a question regarding 1 Ledbury Road, the assistant director clarified that there was a range of provision that would be available from 1 April 2017 and which had been developed with parents and carers. 1 Ledbury Road was to close on 31 March 2017 there was a mixed response from families in this regard and officers were working with parents on alternative provision.  A developmental approach was being taken to commissioning including family-based overnight provision being extended. Distance to this provision was an important consideration for some families.

In answer to a question from the chair about what was in place for this group with regard to NEETs, the assistant director confirmed that all NEETs were tracked within service priorities to identify appropriate support.  

 

It was noted that early help support directly affected entry into higher threshold services and it was important to note that a range of activity was already taking place across early years settings, schools, colleges, local communities and by the private and voluntary  ...  view the full minutes text for item 109.

110.

Corporate delivery plan 2017-18 pdf icon PDF 304 KB

To review whether the commissioning plans and arrangements for the NHS, public health and social care are in line with and have given due regard to the health and wellbeing strategy.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The directorate services team leader for economy, communities and corporate presented an update on the corporate delivery plan.  The plan, which was approved last year, covers 2016 to 2020, with four priorities:

 

·         enable residents to live safe, healthy and independent lives

·         keep children and young people safe and give them a great start in life

·         support the growth of our economy

·         secure better services, quality of life and value for money

 

The activities in the plan would be delivered over a number of years, so this report sets out the 2017-18 delivery plan that would be presented to cabinet in April 2017, followed by an end of year report.  

 

Board members noted that there was considerable health and wellbeing activity threaded throughout the corporate aims and this was commended. Health and wellbeing had been brought to the top of the agenda and was becoming evident.

 

RESOLVED

That it be confirmed to cabinet that the plan is in line with the priorities of the health and wellbeing strategy.

 

111.

Integration: Sustainability and transformation plan (STP) delivery plan pdf icon PDF 211 KB

To provide an update on joint working across the Herefordshire health and wellbeing system.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The update was presented by the director of transformation for One Herefordshire, and the board was invited to consider how the board and the overall aims could be better aligned and the board be more involved in the work. 

 

A number of key milestones had been attained and thanks were expressed to Healthwatch for their engagement work which had been commended by NHS England.

 

The plan was being refreshed at this point and external resources were being considered within the remodelling. There were plans to hold meetings of both health and wellbeing boards of Herefordshire and Worcestershire to sit simultaneously during May 2017 prior to the Clinical Commissioning Group’s governing body meeting, and it was suggested that the same approach could be taken with health scrutiny committees. Work had commenced to scope the approach for co-production.

 

It was noted that consultation events regarding the proposals for walk-in centre arrangements in Hereford were to be commended for their approach in ensuring questions were responded to thoroughly.

 

One Herefordshire, as the delivery mechanism for integration, was based on a logic model, or plan, bringing together the prevention, self-care and public health agenda.  Key enablers in this were recruitment and the workforce, and information management and technology, for which there were working groups and sharing of information and common themes.

The aim was also to extend engagement to the parts of the community and voluntary sector beyond health and social care and there had been developments around estates and transport infrastructure across partners to support integration. 

 

In terms of communications and engagement, there was a high level engagement programme which had been presented to the health and social care overview and scrutiny committee. It was noted that there were particular sensitivities that the approach to engagement and consultation needed to take into account.

 

Discussion took place regarding the role of the health and wellbeing board as the public facing element of the plan’s delivery, and consideration of appropriate membership to include the provider element. It was important to ensure that the governance role of the health and wellbeing board was effective, and that there was improved engagement with the public.

 

RESOLVED

That

a)    The director for adults and wellbeing, with CCG officers, be commissioned to review the governance arrangements for the  health and wellbeing board to ensure that:

o    membership is appropriately aligned to facilitate the delivery of the STP through One Herefordshire

o    there are mechanisms in place to raise the profile of the board’s work including provision for engagement with the public

b)   the outcomes of this review be presented to the health and wellbeing board in May 2017