To receive apologies for absence.

Apologies were received from Councillor Jacqui Carwardine.

To receive details of any Member nominated to attend the meeting in place of a Member of the Committee.

There were no substitutes.

To receive declarations of interests in respect of items on the agenda.

There were no declarations of interest.

To approve the minutes of the meeting held on 21 August 2024.

RESOLVED:  That the minutes of the meeting held on 21 August 2024 be approved.

Proposed restoration and residential use of the farmstead at Aubreys including: the conversion of and extension of the existing farmstead, proposed detached building for garaging, workshop and plant storage, extensive landscaping and rewilding of the wider site, the installation of an access track and associated works.

Application refused, contrary to the case officer’s recommendation.

The Development Manager Hereford and South team provided a presentation on the application and the updates/representations received following the publication of the agenda. A verbal update was provided on a recent application to Heritage England for listed building status for the farmstead at Aubreys and the implications for decision making on the application.

In accordance with the criteria for public speaking Mrs Tribe, spoke on behalf of Longtown Group Parish Council, Mrs Griffiths, local resident, spoke in objection to the application and Mr Gardener, the applicant, spoke in support.

In accordance with the council's constitution the local ward member spoke on the application. In summary, he explained the location of the proposed development was in a landscape of outstanding and unspoilt quality which should have received statutory protection. The location of the application site was prominent in the Olchon Valley due to its setting high on the hillside. Had an application been received for a new house at the application site it would have been denied. In the present application, policy RA5 of the core strategy was used to make use of existing buildings at the farmstead. It was noted that an earlier application for the site had been refused and the current application had been adjusted in line with that refusal. The very late receipt of the structural survey concerning the existing buildings (as required under core strategy policy RA5) was raised. The description of the existing buildings on site in the survey was at odds with the assessment of their condition within the officers report. The value of the structural survey from the applicant was questioned as it presented a partial view of the state of the existing buildings. The impact of the proposed development on the landscape was unacceptable. The development would be clearly visible from vantage points around the local landscape and would have a detrimental impact on the beauty and outstanding quality of the local area. There was no support for the application in the Olchon Valley where it was felt that the development would tarnish the beauty of the Valley and harm tourism. It was felt that the case officer’s report should contain greater regard for the opinions of the Landscape Officer and Heritage Officer and their objections regarding the impact of the application with reference to core strategy policies LD1 and LD4.

The committee debated the application. There was division among the members of the committee regarding the acceptability of the application.

In judging the application as acceptable some members made the points below:

- the application would be positive in its reinstatement and renovation of heritage buildings. The reuse and repurposing of existing stonework would ensure that the development was not intrusive upon the landscape.

- the prominence of the application site and it's visibility from other vantage points locally was not felt to be a significant concern.

In judging the application as unacceptable some members made the points below:

- the scale of the proposed development, the proposed building materials and  ...  view the full minutes text for item 28.