Agenda item
CHAIRMAN'S ANNOUNCEMENTS
To receive any announcements from the Chairman.
Minutes:
The Chairman welcomed Mr Andrew Ashcroft, the new Head of planning Services to his first meeting of the Committee. He also reported on the following matters:-
HEREFORD FLOOD ALLEVIATION SCHEME
A planning application would be considered at a forthcoming meeting of the Committee and would be preceded by a site inspection.
PERFORMANCE BY PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
(a) Development Control Performance
BV 109 – processing planning applications
In the quarter ending 30th June 2006 the Best Value performance figures for processing planning applications were as follows:
April to June 2006 |
Performance |
Target |
Major applications in under 13 weeks |
75% |
60% |
Minor applications in under 8 weeks |
85% |
65% |
Other applications in under 8 weeks |
90% |
80% |
It follows that all three BV 109 targets were met.
No announcement has been made yet about next years Planning Delivery Grant but it is expected that the Development Control element of Planning Delivery Grant will be based on 12 months performance to June 2006. The BV 109 out-turn figures for this period were:
July 2005 to June 2006 |
Performance |
Target |
Major applications in under 13 weeks |
63% |
60% |
Minor applications in under 8 weeks |
77% |
65% |
Other applications in under 8 weeks |
86% |
80% |
It follows that all three BV 109 targets were met for the relevant period and, hopefully, the Planning Delivery Grant will in due course reflect this.
BV 204 - Appeals
In the quarter April to June 2006 22 appeals against refusals of planning permission have been determined and, of these, only 4 have been upheld. This is a percentage of 18%. There is no national target for this figure, but the national average is around 33% and Herefordshire Council’s local target is 25%. It follows that, in this first quarter of the year, performance has been well above target.
Enforcement
Currently there are no Best Value Performance indicators for enforcement, but data is being collected with a view to developing local enforcement indicators. In the quarter April to June the following data has been collected:
Enforcement Monitoring |
April to June 2006 |
Total number of new cases notified to enforcement officers |
235 |
Outcome of investigations |
74 |
No apparent breach |
|
Not expedient to take action |
24 |
Resolved by negotiation, compliance or grant of planning permission |
92 |
Passed on to other service areas |
7 |
Total Cases Closed in Quarter |
197 |
Formal Actions Taken |
|
Planning Contravention Notices |
22 |
Breach of Condition Notices |
5 |
Enforcement Notices |
10 |
Prosecutions |
1 |
Clearance of Site under default powers |
1 |
Total Formal Actions |
39 |
Data has also been collected on the number of planning applications received as a result of enforcement investigations.
In the quarter April to June 2006 53 Applications have been received as a result of Planning Enforcement Action. These have generated in £8,800 application fees.
(a) Changes to the Development Control System
Further provisions of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 have been brought into effect. In particular, from 10th August 2006 most planning applications will need to be accompanied by a “Design and Access Statement”. These statements will require developers to set out, in a formal statement, the justification for the following aspects of their proposals:
the proposed use of the site
the amount of development (including its density)
the proposed Layout
the Scale of the development
Landscaping
Overall appearance
In terms of access developers will have to explain how the development makes provision for access to the site and within the site, and how it relates to the “Movement network” in the locality including roads, paths, and public transport facilities.
It is hoped that Design and Access Statements will allow a significant change in the way applications are assessed so that, for example, local planning authorities can consider whether the design is good enough to approve, rather than whether it is not bad enough to refuse.