Issue - meetings
Annual review of Earmarked Reserves – 2025/26
Meeting: 05/02/2026 - Cabinet (Item 67)
67 Annual review of Earmarked Reserves – 2025/26
PDF 220 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Councillor Stoddart, cabinet member for finance and corporate services introduced the report.
The Cabinet received a report on the annual review of Earmarked Reserves and the General Fund for 2026/27. The report outlined the rationale for each reserve and the reasons for maintaining them at their stated levels, ensuring the Council can meet known future commitments and mitigate unforeseen financial risks.
It was noted that earmarked reserves support specific priorities, contingencies, and cash?flow management, while the General Fund acts as a strategic reserve for emergencies. As at 31 March 2025, the General Fund balance stood at £10.1m (4.3% of the 2025/26 net revenue budget), within the required 3–5% threshold.
Earmarked reserves totalled £80.7m at 31 March 2025, including reserves for liabilities and risk (£16.8m), budget resilience (£14.1m), strategic priorities (£9.3m), accounting reserves (£1.8m), grants and contributions (£27m), and schools?related balances (£11.7m). This included £18m in unspent grant funding carried forward in line with CIPFA guidance.
Forecast balances indicated that earmarked reserves were expected to reduce to £65.2m by 31 March 2026 and £41.6m by 31 March 2027, before accounting for any new grants received. The Quarter 2 Budget Report (2025/26) projected a £7m overspend, reduced to £3.7m after management action, with any final overspend to be funded from reserves.
The Medium?Term Financial Strategy highlighted ongoing financial risks and the need to minimise and replenish reserve usage to maintain resilience. Annual review of reserves aligns with CIPFA best practice, and the Section 151 Officer’s statutory responsibilities under Section 25 of the Local Government Act 2003 were noted.
No comments from cabinet members.
Group Leaders were invited to offer their views:
The Independent for Herefordshire Group outlined their views and noted:
Concern was expressed about the significant projected reduction in
reserves, falling from around £80m to approximately £41
to 42m around a 50% decrease. It was queried how reserves could
realistically be rebuilt through grants, with scepticism that
substantial additional funding would be forthcoming from central
government. It was suggested that the financial position was moving
in a worrying direction over the coming years.
The Green Group outlined their views and noted:
It was noted that reserves exist to provide a cushion for
unforeseen expenditure and emerging risks. Reference was made to
the increasing impact of climate change, including higher levels of
rainfall and flooding, which are causing significant damage to
council assets beyond what can be managed within normal
road?maintenance budgets. It was highlighted that further pressures
on assets and residents are likely, and that this may necessitate
drawing on reserves. Concern was expressed that the council is
moving into an increasingly challenging financial position.
The Liberal Democrat Group outlined their views and noted that:
No comments.
In responding to the comments raised, the Cabinet Members noted that:
It was clarified that while no
additional central government funding was expected, any future
financial surpluses identified through the council’s
financial strategy will be directed into reserves.
It was further noted that the costs associated with cancelling the bypass ... view the full minutes text for item 67
PDF 210 KB