Issue - meetings

221604 - LAND TO THE NORTH OF THE B4348, MUCH DEWCHURCH, HEREFORDSHIRE, HR2 8DQ

Meeting: 28/06/2023 - Planning and Regulatory Committee (Item 4)

4 221604 - LAND TO THE NORTH OF THE B4348, MUCH DEWCHURCH, HEREFORDSHIRE, HR2 8DQ pdf icon PDF 556 KB

Proposed erection of a detached dwellinghouse.

Decision:

Application approved in accordance with the case officer’s recommendation.

Minutes:

Councillor Richard Thomas left the committee to act as the local ward member for the application below.

 

The senior planning officer gave a presentation on the application and the updates/representations received following the publication of the agenda as provided in the update sheet and appended to these minutes.

 

In accordance with the council's constitution the local ward member spoke on the application. In summary, he explained that due to the flooding problems in the field proposed for the development he was asking the committee to refuse the application. Photographs had been circulated which showed flooding on and around the application site. The neighbouring property to the application site had experienced flooding up to the boundary of the garden; the application site lay at a level 1 metre below the neighbouring property and therefore flooding would occur on the proposed development. The applicant had sought to prove that there would be no flooding but the site was known locally to flood. A previous application for development on the site was refused due to inadequate flood risk assessments and the decision was upheld on appeal. There existed a more suitable location for development on a higher part of the site and it was not understood why the applicant sought to build on the same site that had been previously refused.

 

The committee debated the application. During consideration of the application the representations and local knowledge of the ward member and Parish Council in respect of the site were acknowledged and appreciated. The committee noted that statutory consultees, including Balfour Beatty, had not raised any objections to the location of the development with regard to the risk of flooding.

 

The local ward member was given the opportunity to close the debate. The incidence of flooding had become more frequent and the application site was in an area which had experienced significant flooding three times since 2012.

 

A motion that the application be approved in accordance with the case officer’s recommendation was proposed by Councillor Bruce Baker and seconded by Councillor Clare Davies. The motion was put to the vote and was carried by a simple majority.

 

RESOLVED

 

That planning permission be granted subject to the following conditions and any other further conditions considered necessary by officers named in the scheme of delegation to officers:

 

 

1.

Time limit for commencement (full permission)

           

2.

Development in accordance with approved plans

 

3.

Restriction of hours during construction