Issue - meetings

Auditor’s Annual Report

Meeting: 10/05/2022 - Audit and Governance Committee (Item 95)

95 Auditor’s Annual Report 2020/21 pdf icon PDF 206 KB

To present to the audit and governance committee the auditor’s Annual Report 2020-21 for information and discussion.

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Key Audit Partner introduced the Auditor’s Annual Report, the principal points included:

 

i.             Narrative content had increased, reflecting the National Audit Office Code of Audit Practice 2020.

 

ii.            The final version was dated 11 April 2022, noting a national issue with the delivery of local authority audits.

 

iii.          The report was for 2020/21 but it was recognised that the council was making progress on various initiatives, with attention drawn to the changes and service improvements highlighted in the executive summary.

 

iv.          There were three key recommendations, in relation to Children’s Social Care Services (one) and Contract Management (two).  In terms of contract appointment and management arrangements with a dormant company, it was reported that Balfour Beatty Living Places Limited (BBLP) had been transparent with the council but the council itself had not constructed its contractual arrangements in such a way that reflected how BBLP and Balfour Beatty operated.

 

v.           There were fourteen improvement recommendations, in relation to improving economy, efficiency and effectiveness (five), governance (two), and financial sustainability (seven).

 

The responses of the Key Audit Partner to questions from committee members included:

 

1.           It was understood that the Audit Commission had been the external auditor when the contract was made with BBLP.

 

2.           In terms of improvement recommendation 8 and increasing the financial planning timeframe, it was commented that three years was a common period for a Medium Term Financial Strategy.

 

3.           There had been matters identified in Children’s Social Care Services in previous years and assurances received but the severity of the issue and the court judgement in 2021 had not been anticipated.  It was emphasised that this was an area of professional practice and auditors had to draw upon the work of specialised regulators in terms of the quality of the care arrangements in place.

 

The responses to other questions included:

 

4.           The Director for Resources and Assurance outlined the process for the consideration of recommendations by officers, the inclusion of management comments, the consideration of the arrangements by the Corporate Leadership Team and the allocation of work, reports being made to the executive where appropriate, and for external audit to check on delivery and to report back to the committee if necessary.

 

5.           The Public Sector Assurance VfM Specialist considered that a management comment, ‘The Council will review and improve the self-assessment document itself and ensure that it complies with the Council’s definition of a significant partnership.  The Council will also revisit the guidance issued for the reviewing of the self-assessment document.’, should address the improvement recommendation.  It was noted that there was an opportunity for officers to include narrative to explain the value of the significant partnerships.

 

6.           The Key Audit Partner noted that the committee may wish to seek further assurance in terms of the management responses to certain recommendations.  A committee member suggested an action in relation to major contracts.

 

7.           The Director for Resources and Assurance, declaring their position as a director of the company on behalf of the council currently, confirmed  ...  view the full minutes text for item 95


Meeting: 12/04/2022 - Audit and Governance Committee (Item 81)

81 Auditor’s Annual Report 2020/21 pdf icon PDF 207 KB

To present to the audit and governance committee the auditor’s Annual Report 2020-21 for information and discussion.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The chairperson noted that the report had not been published at least five clear working days before the meeting.  The chairperson moved a proposed variation at the meeting to defer the item to the next meeting of the committee to enable full debate and to facilitate the receipt of any related questions from members of the public or from councillors.  This was agreed by the committee.  There was a brief discussion about the need to provide papers in a timely manner for all committee meetings.