Agenda and minutes

Venue: Council Chamber - Brockington

Contact: Tim Brown, Governance Services 

Items
No. Item

1.

APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE

To receive apologies for absence.

Minutes:

Apologies were received from Mr C Bull, Supt C Hill, Dr A Watts and Mr M Woodford.  Apologies were also received from Councillor JG Jarvis.

2.

NAMED SUBSTITUTES

To receive any details of Members nominated to attend the meeting in place of a Member of the Committee.

Minutes:

Dr S Ghazawy substituted for Dr A Watts, Mr H Oddy for Mr M Woodford and Mr D Taylor for Mr C Bull.

3.

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

To receive any declarations of interests of interest by Members in respect of items on the Agenda.

Minutes:

There were none.

4.

MINUTES pdf icon PDF 54 KB

To approve and sign the Minutes of the meeting held on 20 March 2012.

Minutes:

RESOLVED:  That the Minutes of the meeting held on 20 March 2012 be confirmed a as a correct record and signed by the Chairman.

5.

UNDERSTANDING HEREFORDSHIRE - THE 2012 INTEGRATED NEEDS ASSESSMENT pdf icon PDF 101 KB

To receive the 2012 summary Integrated Needs Assessment document “Understanding Herefordshire”, and note the programme of work towards a “Gold Standard” Integrated Needs Assessment.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Board considered the 2012 summary Integrated Needs Assessment (INA) and the programme of work towards a “Gold Standard” Integrated Needs Assessment.

The Consultant in Public Health Medicine presented the report.  She highlighted that the document was integral to the commissioning cycle, providing an explicit evidence base that would enable strategic priorities, commissioning decisions and partnership working to be based upon a clear and comprehensive understanding of need.  She specifically invited comment on areas where the Board would like more in depth analysis over the coming year.

The Principal Research Officer gave a demonstration of how the information underpinning the high level summary document was made available on the Council’s website.

In discussion the following principal points were made:

·         The asset base as a whole required further analysis.  Carers were highlighted as a vital asset that needed to be protected. More analysis was needed on the needs of carers including their access to healthcare services.

 

·         It was suggested that there also needed to be more analysis of mental health and wellbeing needs.

 

·         Changes to the welfare system and growing poverty were highlighted as issues that would have an impact on the County.

 

·         The potential for facilitating self-help needed further consideration.

 

·         The locality analysis was welcomed and its potential benefit to all providers acknowledged.  It was emphasised that it was important that the analysis was considered in localities and the differences between localities and the need and scope for action to address these differences discussed.

 

·         The importance of ensuring that the Board’s priorities were firmly founded on the evidence and that the analysis was used to inform considerations across all organisations in the County was emphasised. When matters came before the Board for consideration evidence should be provided to demonstrate how proposals addressed the issues highlighted in the INA.

 

·         On behalf of the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) it was suggested that the scheduled bi-monthly meetings of practitioners could provide a useful forum for ensuring the analysis was more widely shared.

 

·         The potential to develop the website to make it interactive, generating user feedback and information on people’s experience of services was noted.

 

·         It would be of benefit to demonstrate in the INA summary how account had been taken of information gathered at stakeholder events.

 

·         A view was expressed on behalf of the CCG that whilst the INA was a vital part of the evidence base there were additional sources of information of which the CCG needed to take account in forming the commissioning strategy.  This included directives from the Department of Health, and qualitative issues including information gathered directly by clinicians and other frontline staff.  There may therefore be instances where the priorities agreed by the CCG did not correspond precisely with those in the INA.

 

The consensus was that it was important that the INA captured all the available sources of information and organisations highlighted any aspects of which account had not been taken. The engagement process was designed to achieve this objective.  It was recognised that having considered  ...  view the full minutes text for item 5.

6.

HEALTH WATCH HEREFORDSHIRE pdf icon PDF 80 KB

To update the Herefordshire Health and Wellbeing Board on the progress made to date regarding Healthwatch Herefordshire and to seek the Board’s views on the issues outlined in the attached discussion paper.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Board considered the progress made to date regarding Healthwatch Herefordshire.

 

The Assistant Director – Customer Services and Communications presented the report and the appended discussion paper.  Four options were set out in the discussion paper.  The Board was invited to support Option 2 – providing the Healthwatch function as part of an existing not for profit organisation.

 

In discussion the following principal points were made:

 

·         The consultation undertaken on the options to date was discussed.  It was noted that this was ongoing.  Cabinet was due to consider the proposal on 12 July 2012 and, given the tight timescale it was advised that responses would be accepted until the day before that meeting.

 

·         The Board sought clarification on the approach across the region and was informed that a range of options were being explored.  It noted that if it were to be pursued the detail of option 2 would need to be developed.  Whether any local organisation would be a suitable provider would need to be established at that point.

 

·         It was emphasised that a number of lessons needed to be learned from the operation of the Local Involvement Network, the predecessor to Healthwatch. In establishing the new function there were a number of reputational issues to consider.  It was essential that the function demonstrated independence and was capable of delivering effective challenge to commissioners and providers.

 

·         The Board acknowledged the tight timescale for putting arrangements in place and supported option 2, but on the basis that this would be for a two year period with a view to exploring procurement options after that time.

 

RESOLVED:

 

That    (a)        the content of the discussion paper be noted; and

 

(b)          the recommendation to pursue option 2 – that Herefordshire Healthwatch be provided through an arrangement with the local voluntary sector be supported, on the basis that this was for a two year period with a view to exploring procurement options after that time.

7.

HEALTH AND WELLBEING COMMUNICATIONS AND ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY AND PARTNERSHIP WORKING pdf icon PDF 114 KB

To update the Health and Wellbeing Board on the different strands of work currently underway intended to address key strategic and operation communications issues.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Assistant Director – Customer Services and Communications presented the report.

 

The Board discussed a number of recent communication and community engagement issues that had arisen.  The Assistant Director confirmed that lessons had been learned from these episodes and the strategy was designed to address them. 

 

The Board proposed that a further report should be made on how the Strategy was being implemented and an informal sub-group be formed to provide a sounding board.

 

RESOLVED:

 

That      (a)     the report be noted and the Board continue to support the implementation and development of the joint communications and engagement strategy, as appended to the report;

 

              (b)     the further local integration of communications and engagement working be supported in line with the model set out at page 88 of the agenda papers; and

 

(c)       a further report be made to the Board on how the Strategy is being implemented; and

 

(d)       an informal sub-Group of Board Members be formed to provide a sounding board for the development and implementation of the Strategy.

8.

HEALTH AND WELLBEING BOARD WORK PLAN pdf icon PDF 69 KB

To consider the current Work Plan.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Board noted the Work Plan.

 

The Chairman outlined the intention to hold some meetings at external venues incorporating visits to service providers and to undertake other activities through which the Board and its Members could raise the Board’s profile.

9.

WORKSHOP UPDATE

To receive an update at the meeting on work undertaken since the last workshop.

Minutes:

The Chairman reported that work to take account of the outcomes of the last workshop had been completed and a draft paper would be circulated.  

10.

FUTURE MEETINGS

The following meetings have been scheduled (meetings are at 2.00pm unless otherwise stated):

 

Tuesday 10 July 2012 (workshop)

Tuesday 18 September 2012 (workshop)

Tuesday 16 October 2012

Tuesday 13 November 2012 (workshop)

Tuesday 11 December 2012 (workshop)

Tuesday 22 January 2013

Tuesday 19 February 2013

Tuesday 19 March 2013

Tuesday 16 April 2013

Tuesday 14 May 2013

 

Minutes:

The Board noted the list of scheduled meetings.