To consider an application for a variation of a premises licence in respect of: Gwalia Stores, 27-29 Broad St, Ross-on-Wye HR9 7ED

Members of the licensing Sub-Committee from the Council’s Planning and Regulatory Committee considered the above application, full details of which appeared before the members in their agenda published on 13 March 2026 and the supplement published on 17 March.

Prior to making its decision the senior licensing officer presented the report which outlined the options available to the Sub-Committee. One representation was received from the Licensing Authority as a Responsible Authority. The Licensing Authority did not object to the application, however, they suggested additional conditions to be added to the premises licence to promote the licensing objectives for a premises licence granted to this location. These additional conditions were agreed by the applicant. One objection was received from Hereford and Worcester Fire Authority, due to outstanding issues from 17 November 2025. The fire safety deficiencies detailed within a letter dated 17 November 2025 remain unresolved and these outstanding matters compromise the safety of persons on the premises and fail to meet the minimum requirements of the Fire Safety Order. One representation was received from Ross Town Council, the representation stated that the additional hours would potentially increase anti-social behaviour which is already prevalent in the area. No representations were received from the Police.

The Sub-Committee then heard from the applicant’s representative Mr Naga Rajesh that:

·       The previous review of the premises licence had occurred in 2012, before the management of the current premises licence holder (PLH).

·       The current PLH had run the business for 5-6 years and had a good track record.

·       It was confirmed that Mr Rajesh had not been involved when the application had been made by the PLH but had become involved later in the process.

·       Since the current PLH had taken over the premises, there had been no issues or complaints raised with the running of the business and there had been no objections from any of the responsible authorities.

·       The shop was open until 10:00 p.m. but alcohol was not sold beyond the licenced hours of  to 8:00 p.m.

·       There was a demand from customers to sell later alcohol to a later time than 8pm. The restriction of not being able to sell past 8 p.m. was undermining customer good will. The need to cover alcohol displays after 8:00 p.m. and refuse sales past this time was negatively affecting customer relationships.

·       The existing hours of opening had not resulted in any complaints relating to the shop.

·       The shop was the PLH’s livelihood and he would not jeopardise his livelihood by undermining the licensing objectives.

·       There were a number of conditions on the licence which were accepted and would be applied in operations at the shop.

·       Fire safety at the premises  is being addressed; a company was working at the premises to address issues raised. The work would be completed soon which was an assurance offered by the PLH.

·       Other concerns raised regarding the application concerned crime and disorder. The premises was not in an identified problem area. The police are the key consultees in respect  ...  view the full minutes text for item 46