Issue - meetings

2021/22 council tax setting report

Meeting: 05/03/2021 - Council (Item 53)

53 2021/22 COUNCIL TAX SETTING REPORT pdf icon PDF 325 KB

To set the council tax and precepts for 2021/22.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Council considered a report by the Leader of the Council to set the Council tax and precepts for 2020/21.

 

The Chairman referred the meeting to the correction supplement published on the 4 March containing a corrected version of the 2021/22 council tax setting report. The Chairman outlined two corrections to the detail contained in the correction supplement: the cover to the correction supplement should state that the title of column 6 of appendix 1 was % change from 2020/21 to 2021/22; and the pound sign in advance of the net tax base of band D equivalent properties in recommendation (b) should be discounted.

 

The cabinet member finance and corporate services introduced the report and proposed the recommendations. In introducing the report she explained that the council was the billing authority and collected council tax. The report sought approval to set the precepts for each category of dwelling taking account of the council’s precept, parish council’s precepts, the police and crime commissioner’s precept and the Hereford and Worcester Fire Authority precept. The support provided by parish councils in the provision of services was highlighted and it was noted that the tax base had reduced from the 2020/21 year which affected the percentage change of parish council precepts.     

 

The Leader seconded the recommendations in the report and explained the variable precepts across parish councils. The decision before Council was a formal process to agree the council tax liability for households in the county.

 

The monitoring officer clarified that a liability on the part of members to pay council tax did not create a disclosable pecuniary interest. As council tax payers there was no need for a dispensation for members to participate in council tax setting.

 

The following principal points were raised during the debate:

 

·         Equivalent rural sparsity arrangements for the police and crime commissioner and the fire authority. The provision of a £100k rural grant to the fire and rescue service but no equivalent arrangement for the police force.

·         Initiatives to build stronger relationships with parish councils to help the sharing of best practice in areas such as drainage and flooding response.

·         Tribute was paid to the work of parish councils and the increasing role they played locally.

·         The value for money assessment of parish councils and the criteria for audits of parish councils applied by the external auditor.

·         The need for a correction to the police and crime commissioner’s precept contained in appendix 4.

 

The report and recommendations in the correction supplement were put to the recorded vote and were carried by a simple majority of the Council.

 

For (37): Councillors Paul Andrews, Bartlett, Bolderson, Boulter, Bowen, Bowes, Chowns, Crockett, Davies, Fagan, Foxton, Gandy, Guthrie, Hardwick, Harrington, Harvey, Hewitt, Hey, Hitchiner, I’Anson, Jinman, Graham Jones, Lester, Marsh, Milln, Norman, Phillips, Rone, Seldon, Shaw, Stone, Summers, Swinglehurst, Toynbee, Tyler, Watson and Wilding.

 

Against (14): Councillors Polly Andrews, Bartrum, Durkin, Howells, James, Johnson, Mike Jones, Kenyon, Matthews, Millmore, Price, Stark, Symonds and Tillett.

 

Abstain (0)

 

RESOLVED – That:

a)    The precepting authority details  ...  view the full minutes text for item 53