Decision details

Justice for Tenants (JFT) – Renters’ Rights Act 2025: Housing Enforcement, Civil Penalties and HMO Licensing

Decision Maker: Cabinet member roads and regulatory services

Decision status: Recommendations Approved (subject to call-in)

Is Key decision?: Yes

Is subject to call in?: Yes

Purpose:

This report seeks approval from the Cabinet Member for Roads and Regulatory Services to adopt a revised private rented sector enforcement framework in preparation for the commencement of the Renters’ Rights Act 2025.
The report proposes the adoption of a Justice for Tenants (JFT) Housing Enforcement Policy, a standalone JFT Civil Penalty Policy and matrix, and updated standard HMO licence conditions, together with approval to enter into a JFT support contract (subject to legal review and agreement) to support implementation.
The purpose of the report is to ensure the Council is legally compliant, operationally ready and able to deliver consistent, transparent and defensible enforcement of housing standards and landlord legislation from 1 May 2026.

Decision:

That:

a)     The Justice for Tenants (JFT) Housing Enforcement Policy be adopted;

b)     The JFT Civil Penalty Policy and matrix be adopted;

c)     The JFT standard HMO licence conditions be adopted as the Council’s standard conditions for HMO licensing; and

d)     Authority be given to enter into the JFT Group Services Contract, subject to legal review and agreement prior to execution.

 

The JFT policies have been selected because they are specifically designed to align with the new statutory enforcement duties and accompanying guidance under the Renters’ Rights Act 2025. Adoption of the policies does not require entry into a support contract. Any engagement with JFT support services contract would be subject to legal review and compliance with the Council’s Contract Procedure Rules.

 

Alternative options considered:

1.         Adopt the JFT policies and licence conditions without entering into the JFT support contract.

This option would achieve formal legislative  compliance but would require all implementation, training, quality assurance and appeals preparation to be managed internally. This option is legally permissible; however, officers consider it would increase early stage delivery and legal risk. This would increase operational risk during the early stages of the new regime and place additional pressure on officer capacity. This option is not recommended.

2.         Undertake limited engagement with JFT (e.g. training or tools only) without adopting the full policy framework.

This option would result in misalignment between adopted policy, statutory duties and operational tools, increasing the risk of inconsistent enforcement outcomes and successful challenge. This option is not recommended.

 

3.         Retain the existing enforcement framework and make incremental changes once the Act is live.

This option would leave the Council operating under policies that do not adequately reflect the statutory duty to enforce and would expose the authority to increased legal, operational and reputational risk. This option is not recommended.

Reason Key: Strategic nature / impact on communities;

Wards Affected: (All Wards);

Details of any declarations of interest: None

Consultees

Legal Services
Regulatory and Technical Services
Economy and Environment Directorate Management Team

Contact: Charles Yarnold, Head of Regulation and Technical Services Email: Charles.Yarnold@herefordshire.gov.uk Tel: 01432 260765.

Publication date: 15/05/2026

Date of decision: 15/05/2026

Date comes into force if not called in: 22/05/2026

Call-in deadline date: 21/05/2026

Current call-in Count: 0

Accompanying Documents: